chk2 activator (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Chk2 Activator, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 11 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chk2+activator/pmc12808782-411-0-7?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 11 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Aberrant cytoplasmic localization of MLH1 characterizes a cell population that seeds breast cancer recurrence"
Article Title: Aberrant cytoplasmic localization of MLH1 characterizes a cell population that seeds breast cancer recurrence
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67257-8
Figure Legend Snippet: Representative immunofluorescence photomicrographs showing pChk2 ( A ) in cells grown in 2D or PCNA ( B ) in xenografted tumors (red) with a DAPI (blue) nuclear counterstain in indicated cells with indicated treatments. Accompanying quantification is presented as bar graphs from three biological replicates ( A ) and three tumors in each group ( B ). For A Fulvs (WT vs G55V p = 0.0042). For B WT (Veh vs Fulvs p = 0.00012), G55V (Veh vs Fulvs p = 0.038) and Fulvs (WT vs G55V p = 0.0058). Associated data in T47D cells in Fig. . C Bar graphs from three biological replicates showing growth of indicated cells after indicated treatments for 36 h relative to vehicle-treated controls. For Fulvs (WT vs G55V p = 0.0020). Associated data in T47D cells is presented in Fig. . D Representative images of T47D WT and T47D G55V spheroids after indicated treatments with accompanying quantification. Each dot represents an individual spheroid from a biological replicate (n = 5). For Fulvs/Veh (WT vs G55V p = 0.00030) and Fulvs+DIM/Fulvs (WT vs G55V p = 0.0027). E Regression analysis of cytoplasmic MLH1 positivity plotted against nuclear pChk2 positivity in HCI and BCM PDX lines p = 0.0003. F Dot plot representing quantification of cells positive for cytoplasmic localization of MLH1 and nuclear localization of pChk2 in each PDX tumor of the ST panel p = 0.0007. Each symbol represents an individual PDX. Experiments were performed 3 times. Associated representative images in Fig. . Two-sided Student’s t test determined all p-values. *** p ≤ 0.0001, ** p ≤ 0.01 and * p ≤ 0.05. For all graphs, data are presented as mean values ± SD. Vertical line depicts median value in ( F ). Scale bars = 20 µm ( A , B ) and 50 µM ( D ). Abbreviations: WT wild type, DAPI 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, pChk2 phosphorylated Chk2, PCNA proliferating cell nuclear antigen, cMLH1 cytoplasmic MLH1, nMLH1 nuclear Mlh1, PDXs patient derived xenografts, HCI PDXs from Huntsman Cancer Institute, BCM PDXs from Baylor College of Medicine, Rel. relative, A.U. arbitrary unit, Treatments, Veh vehicle, Fulvs fulvestrant, DIM di-indolyl methane. Source data for all figures available with the paper.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A Schematic showing how MLH1 activates Chk2 and inhibits CDK4/6 activity. B qRT-PCR analysis of MCF7 cells of indicated genotypes for relative expression of specified genes following fulvestrant treatment from three biological replicates. For CDK6 (WT vs G55V p = 0.012), CDKN1B (WT vs G55V p = 0.0028), CCND1 (WT vs G55V p = 0.010). C Western blotting confirming CDK6 knockdown in MCF7 cells. Representative blot from three biological replicate. D , E Bar graph showing growth of MCF7 WT , MCF7 G55V and MCF7 shMLH1cells with respective treatments from three independent biological replicate. Bar graphs describing relative spheroid size grown from T47D WT , T47D G55V and T47D shMLH1 cells ( F ) and specified PDxO ( G ) in response to palbociclib treatment. For F each dot represents spheroid from an independent biological replicate (n = 5). For G each dot represents a biological replicate (n = 4). All experiments were performed >2 times. For D Fulvs (WT vs G55V p = 0.00002) and (WT vs shMLH1 p = 0.0019). For E Fulvs (WT vs G55V p = 0.00084, WT vs shMLH1 p = 0.0014), Palbo (WT vs G55V p = 0.0022, WT vs shMLH1 p = 0.010). For F WT (Veh vs Palbo p = 0.00013), G55V (Veh vs Palbo p = 0.000019), Palbo (WT vs G55V p = 0.000004). For G (HCI003 vs HCI017 p = 0.000012, HCI007 vs HCI017 p = 0.000012). H , I Line graphs of tumor volume over time for indicated groups with and without palbociclib treatment each line represents an individual tumor. Waterfall plots depicting CDK4/6 inhibitor response expressed as percent growth of treated tumors relative to vehicle-treated controls in PDX lines in response to ( J ) palbociclib (p = 0.011) ( K ) abemaciclib (p = 0.06). For graphs, data are presented as mean values ± SD. Schematic was made using BioRender https://BioRender.com/aok2eve . Two-sided Student’s t test determined p values for ( B – I ) and Fisher’s exact test determined p values for ( J , K ). Abbreviations: WT wild type, nMLH1 nuclear MLH1, cMLH1 cytoplasmic MLH1, pChk2 phosphorylated Chk2, Tx treatments, si small interfering, sh short hairpin, n.s. not significant, rel relative, vol volume, mm 3 millimeter cubed, PDXs patient-derived xenografts, HCI PDXs from Huntsman Cancer Institute, ST PDXs from Xenostart, T/C treatment/control, Treatments, Fulvs fulvestrant, Palbo palbociclib. Source data for all figures available with the paper.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Western Blot, Knockdown, Derivative Assay, Control

